翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning
・ Citizens for Europe
・ Citizens for Fairness Hands Off Washington
・ Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform
・ Citizens for Global Solutions
・ Citizens for Health
・ Citizens for Home Rule
・ Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future
・ Citizens for Public Justice
・ Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
・ Citizens for Rowling
・ Citizens for Self-Governance
・ Citizens for Social Reform
・ Citizens for Sunshine
・ Citizens for Tax Justice
Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters
・ Citizens for the Adelphi Theater
・ Citizens for the Republic
・ Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality
・ Citizens Foundation
・ Citizens Foundation India
・ Citizens Hall
・ Citizens Here and Abroad
・ Citizens High School, Hoskote
・ Citizens Housing and Planning Council (CHPC)
・ Citizens in Charge Foundation
・ Citizens in Rage
・ Citizens Insurance
・ Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons
・ Citizens Justice Association


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters : ウィキペディア英語版
Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters

''Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters'' is a federal lawsuit filed on April 1, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio seeking to overturn Ohio statute ORC 3599.111, which forbids paying petitioners by the signature.〔(Ohio Revised Code 3599.111, the law challenged in this lawsuit )〕 The law went into effect on March 31, 2005.
==Background==
The case arose out of an attempt of Citizens for Tax Reform (CTR), an Ohio political advocacy group, to quality a citizen initiative for the 2005 general election ballot in that state. They contracted with a professional petition drive management company to pay $1.70 per signature for 450,000 signatures. This contract was entered into prior to the contested law taking effect. Once the law took effect, the petition drive management company notified CTR that they could no longer collect signatures at the specified rate and that, indeed, they would require an additional $300,000 to complete the drive.
On March 19, 2005, Judge Sandra Beckwith issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the state of Ohio, enjoining the enforcement of the state's ban on payment-per-signature. The TRO was extended multiple times, until the hearing before Judge Dlott, at which time Dlott invalidated Ohio's law as unconstitutional.〔(Full text of the decision )〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.